Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20433739›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

An EST resource for tilapia based on 17 normalized libraries and assembly of 116,899 sequence tags.

Bo-Young Lee, Aimee E Howe, Matthew A Conte, Helena D'Cotta, Elodie Pepey, Jean-Francois Baroiller, Federica di Palma, Karen L Carleton, Thomas D Kocher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bo-Young LeeDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.
Aimee E Howe
Matthew A Conte
Helena D'Cotta
Elodie Pepey
Jean-Francois Baroiller
Federica di Palma
Karen L Carleton
Thomas D Kocher

Funding

Gene networks regulating sex determination in vertebratesR01HD058635 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI KOCHER, THOMAS D. · 2008 to 2011
$1.3M
Genetic basis of cone opsin gene expressionR15EY016721 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE · PI CARLETON, KAREN L · 2005 to 2005
$218k
NEI NIH HHS 1R15EY016721-01NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD058635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge collections of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) are a fundamental resource for analysis of gene expression and annotation of genome sequences. We generated 116,899 ESTs from 17 normalized and two non-normalized cDNA libraries representing 16 tissues from tilapia, a cichlid fish widely used in aquaculture and biological research.

resultsThe ESTs were assembled into 20,190 contigs and 36,028 singletons for a total of 56,218 unique sequences and a total assembled length of 35,168,415 bp. Over the whole project, a unique sequence was discovered for every 2.079 sequence reads. 17,722 (31.5%) of these unique sequences had significant BLAST hits (e-value < 10(-10)) to the UniProt database.

conclusionNormalization of the cDNA pools with double-stranded nuclease allowed us to efficiently sequence a large collection of ESTs. These sequences are an important resource for studies of gene expression, comparative mapping and annotation of the forthcoming tilapia genome sequence.

Indexed as

Expressed Sequence TagsGenomic LibraryAnimalsDNA, ComplementaryMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideTilapiaDNA, Complementary

Identifiers

PMID20433739
PMCPMC2874815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.