Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20433726›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2010

SNP identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus.

Larissa M Williams, Xin Ma, Adam R Boyko, Carlos D Bustamante, Marjorie F Oleksiak

Open access · diamondAbstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Identification ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  4. Genetic Characterization of a Captive Colony of Pigtailed Macaques (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Larissa M WilliamsRosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149, USA.
Xin Ma
Adam R Boyko
Carlos D Bustamante
Marjorie F Oleksiak
Cornell University · USNorth Carolina State University · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Population Genetic Inferences From Dense Genotype DataR01HG003229 · NHGRI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI BUSTAMANTE, CARLOS DANIEL, CLARK, ANDREW G · 2004 to 2013
$4.8M
Microarray Analyses of Polluted Natural PopulationsR01ES011588 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI ROSENTEIL SCHOOL · PI OLEKSIAK, MARJORIE F · 2004 to 2008
$1.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003229NIEHS NIH HHS ES525163NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES011588PHS HHS DEB0948510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBy targeting SNPs contained in both coding and non-coding areas of the genome, we are able to identify genetic differences and characterize genome-wide patterns of variation among individuals, populations and species. We investigated the utility of 454 sequencing and MassARRAY genotyping for population genetics in natural populations of the teleost, Fundulus heteroclitus as well as closely related Fundulus species (F. grandis, F. majalis and F. similis).

resultsWe used 454 pyrosequencing and MassARRAY genotyping technology to identify and type 458 genome-wide SNPs and determine genetic differentiation within and between populations and species of Fundulus. Specifically, pyrosequencing identified 96 putative SNPs across coding and non-coding regions of the F. heteroclitus genome: 88.8% were verified as true SNPs with MassARRAY. Additionally, putative SNPs identified in F. heteroclitus EST sequences were verified in most (86.5%) F. heteroclitus individuals; fewer were genotyped in F. grandis (74.4%), F. majalis (72.9%), and F. similis (60.7%) individuals. SNPs were polymorphic and showed latitudinal clinal variation separating northern and southern populations and established isolation by distance in F. heteroclitus populations. In F. grandis, SNPs were less polymorphic but still established isolation by distance. Markers differentiated species and populations.

conclusionsIn total, these approaches were used to quickly determine differences within the Fundulus genome and provide markers for population genetic studies.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsBayes TheoremFundulidaeGenotypeSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID20433726
PMCPMC2874759
OpenAlexW2087335601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.