ArticleHEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues2010
A pilot qualitative study of "conflicts of interests and/or conflicting interests" among Canadian bioethicists. Part 2: Defining and managing conflicts.
Article in HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conceptualizing boundaries for the professionalization of healthcare ethics practice: a call for empirical research.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2014Article
- Beyond trail blazing: a roadmap for new healthcare ethics leaders (and the people who hire them).HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2013Article
- Mapping our practice? Some conceptual "bumps" for us to consider.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2012Article
- Grassroots origins, national engagement: exploring the professionalization of practicing healthcare ethicists in Canada.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2012Article
- Echo calling narcissus: what exceeds the gaze of clinical ethics consultation?HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2010Article
- Conflicts of interest policies for authors, peer reviewers, and editors of bioethics journals.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper examines one aspect of professional practice for bioethicists: managing conflicts of interest. Drawing from our qualitative study and descriptive analysis of the experiences of conflicts of interest and/or conflicting interests (COI) of 13 Canadian clinical bioethicists (Frolic and Chidwick 2010), this paper examines how bioethicists define their roles, the nature of COIs in their roles, how their COIs relate to conventional definitions of conflicts of interest, and how COIs can be most effectively managed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.