Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20431534›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2010

The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking.

Sjoerd J de Vries, Marc van Dijk, Alexandre M J J Bonvin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 681 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
681citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

681 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Peptides adopt stable omega-loop structures in concentrated sulfuric acid.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. QBP1 Peptide as a Potential Anti-Amyloidogenic Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes: An In Vitro Study.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Targeting PD-1Science advances · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

621 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sjoerd J de VriesBijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marc van Dijk
Alexandre M J J Bonvin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational docking is the prediction or modeling of the three-dimensional structure of a biomolecular complex, starting from the structures of the individual molecules in their free, unbound form. HADDOCK is a popular docking program that takes a data-driven approach to docking, with support for a wide range of experimental data. Here we present the HADDOCK web server protocol, facilitating the modeling of biomolecular complexes for a wide community. The main web interface is user-friendly, requiring only the structures of the individual components and a list of interacting residues as input. Additional web interfaces allow the more advanced user to exploit the full range of experimental data supported by HADDOCK and to customize the docking process. The HADDOCK server has access to the resources of a dedicated cluster and of the e-NMR GRID infrastructure. Therefore, a typical docking run takes only a few minutes to prepare and a few hours to complete.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalSoftwareDatabases, FactualProteinsUser-Computer InterfaceProteins

Identifiers

PMID20431534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.