Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20430782›Full record

ArticleGenome research2010

Evolutionarily conserved replication timing profiles predict long-range chromatin interactions and distinguish closely related cell types.

Tyrone Ryba, Ichiro Hiratani, Junjie Lu, Mari Itoh, Michael Kulik, Jinfeng Zhang, Thomas C Schulz, Allan J Robins, Stephen Dalton, David M Gilbert

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 375 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
375citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

375 citing papers in PubMed, 644 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Polymorphic 3D genome architecture mediated by transposable elements.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Organization principles of dynamic three-dimensional genome architecture associated with centromere clustering states.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. PARTAGE: Parallel analysis of replication timing and gene expression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The shifting paradigm of chromatin structure: from the 30-nm chromatin fiber to liquid-like organization.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

315 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tyrone RybaDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA.
Ichiro Hiratani
Junjie Lu
Mari Itoh
Michael Kulik
Jinfeng Zhang
Thomas C Schulz
Allan J Robins
Stephen Dalton
David M Gilbert
Florida State University · USUniversity of Georgia · USViaCyte (United States) · US

Funding

UNDERSTANDING MECHANISMS OF hESC SELF-RENEWAL AND CELL FATE COMMITMENTP01GM085354 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI DALTON, STEPHEN · 2008 to 2018
$18.3M
Embryonic stem cell renewal-Myc transcription factorsR01HD049647 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI DALTON, STEPHEN · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS HD049647NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD049647NIGMS NIH HHS GM75334NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM085354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify evolutionarily conserved features of replication timing and their relationship to epigenetic properties, we profiled replication timing genome-wide in four human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines, hESC-derived neural precursor cells (NPCs), lymphoblastoid cells, and two human induced pluripotent stem cell lines (hiPSCs), and compared them with related mouse cell types. Results confirm the conservation of coordinately replicated megabase-sized "replication domains" punctuated by origin-suppressed regions. Differentiation-induced replication timing changes in both species occur in 400- to 800-kb units and are similarly coordinated with transcription changes. A surprising degree of cell-type-specific conservation in replication timing was observed across regions of conserved synteny, despite considerable species variation in the alignment of replication timing to isochore GC/LINE-1 content. Notably, hESC replication timing profiles were significantly more aligned to mouse epiblast-derived stem cells (mEpiSCs) than to mouse ESCs. Comparison with epigenetic marks revealed a signature of chromatin modifications at the boundaries of early replicating domains and a remarkably strong link between replication timing and spatial proximity of chromatin as measured by Hi-C analysis. Thus, early and late initiation of replication occurs in spatially separate nuclear compartments, but rarely within the intervening chromatin. Moreover, cell-type-specific conservation of the replication program implies conserved developmental changes in spatial organization of chromatin. Together, our results reveal evolutionarily conserved aspects of developmentally regulated replication programs in mammals, demonstrate the power of replication profiling to distinguish closely related cell types, and strongly support the hypothesis that replication timing domains are spatially compartmentalized structural and functional units of three-dimensional chromosomal architecture.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionDNA ReplicationAnimalsCell LineChromatinEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansMiceChromatin

Identifiers

PMID20430782
PMCPMC2877573
OpenAlexW2162362951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.