Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20429948›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2010

Patient satisfaction with nurse-led telephone follow-up after curative treatment for breast cancer.

Merel L Kimman, Monique Mf Bloebaum, Carmen D Dirksen, Ruud Ma Houben, Philippe Lambin, Liesbeth J Boersma

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05500391 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Phase II Trial Evaluating Compliance With Monitoring Conducted Either by a Hospital-based Physician in Person or by a Nurse in Remote Monitoring

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Oscar LambretRan2024 to 2032Enrolled88ConditionsStage I Testicular Seminoma, Stage I Testicular Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, Ovarian Germ Cell TumorArmsOncological Follow-up
NCT07572370 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating the De-Escalation of Surveillance for Patients Who Have Undergone Curative Treatment for Primary Breast Cancer - A Prospective, Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeobservationalSponsorRoyal College of Surgeons, IrelandRan2025 to 2028Enrolled560ConditionsBreast CancerArmsDeescalation of surveillance
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Specialist breast care nurses for support of women with breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Personalised treatment for older adults with cancer: The role of frailty assessment.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Merel L KimmanMAASTRO Clinic, Maastricht, the Netherlands. merel.kimman@ctc.usyd.edu.au
Monique Mf Bloebaum
Carmen D Dirksen
Ruud Ma Houben
Philippe Lambin
Liesbeth J Boersma

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent frequent follow-up after treatment for breast cancer does not meet its intended aims, but does depend on expensive and scarce specialized knowledge for routine history taking and physical examinations. The study described in this paper compared patient satisfaction with a reduced follow-up strategy, i.e. nurse-led telephone follow-up, to satisfaction with traditional hospital follow-up.

methodsPatient satisfaction was assessed among patients (n=299) who were participants of a randomized controlled trial investigating the cost-effectiveness of several follow-up strategies in the first year after treatment for breast cancer. Data on patient satisfaction were collected at baseline, three, six and 12 months after treatment, using the Dutch version of Ware's Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire III (PSQ III). In addition to general satisfaction, the PSQ III reports on satisfaction scores for technical competence, interpersonal aspects, and access of care. Regression analysis was used to predict satisfaction scores from whether or not nurse-led telephone follow-up was received.

resultsNurse-led telephone follow-up had no statistically significant influence on general patient satisfaction (p=0.379), satisfaction with technical competence (p=0.249), and satisfaction with interpersonal aspects (p=0.662). Regarding access of care, patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher for patients receiving telephone follow-up (p=0.015). However, a mean difference at 12 months of 3.1 points was judged to be not clinically relevant.

conclusionsNo meaningful differences were found in satisfaction scores between nurse-led telephone and hospital follow-up in the first year after breast cancer treatment. With high satisfaction scores and the potential to substantially reduce clinic visits, nurse-led telephone follow-up may be an acceptable alternative to traditional hospital follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 74071417.

Indexed as

Interviews as TopicMammographyOncology NursingOncology Service, HospitalPatient SatisfactionTelephoneAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsClinical CompetenceCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHealth Care CostsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID20429948
PMCPMC2880988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.