ArticleCytotherapy2010
Adverse events following infusion of T cells for adoptive immunotherapy: a 10-year experience.
Article in Cytotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Single-Center, Open-Label, Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of LB-DTK-BKV in Patients With BK Virus-Associated Hemorrhagic Cystitis Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children, Adolescents, and Adults
A Single-Center, Open-Label, Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of LB-DTK-MV in Patients Diagnosed With Antiviral-Resistant CMV, BKV, or EBV Infection or Associated Diseases Following Anticancer Therapy or Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.
An Exploratory Clinical Study of Autologous LB-DTK-CMV in Patients With Antiviral-Resistant and Refractory Cytomegalovirus Retinitis.
A Prospective Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Virus Specific T-Cell Administration in Pediatric Patients With Systemic Viral Infection Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.
A Single Center, Open-Label, Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerance, and Efficacy of Allogeneic LB-DTK-COV19 Cells in Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell therapy for severe COVID-19: a randomized phase 1/2 trial.Nature medicine · 2023Trial
- Autologous EBV-specific T cell treatment results in sustained responses in patients with advanced extranodal NK/T lymphoma: results of a multicenter study.Annals of hematology · 2021Trial
- Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group Study ARST0332.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2026Article
- Rare but not forgotten: Therapeutic advancements for rare childhood cancers.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2025Review
- Use of Specific T Lymphocytes in Treating Cytomegalovirus Infection in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Tumor immunity: A brief overview of tumor‑infiltrating immune cells and research advances into tumor‑infiltrating lymphocytes in gynecological malignancies (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Review
- Secondary bone marrow graft loss after third-party virus-specific T cell infusion: Case report of a rare complication.Nature communications · 2024Article
- The Effects of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Antigen-Expanded Specific T-Cell Therapy and Vorinostat on Persistent HIV-1 Infection in People With HIV on Antiretroviral Therapy.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of CAR-T treatment toward the potential risk of second malignancies.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Chimeric antigen receptor T cells therapy in solid tumors.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023Review
- Virus-Specific T-Cell Therapy for Viral Infections of the Central Nervous System: A Review.Viruses · 2023Review
- Tuning CARs: recent advances in modulating chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell activity for improved safety, efficacy, and flexibility.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Review
- Tacrolimus-resistant SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell products to prevent and treat severe COVID-19 in immunosuppressed patients.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2022Article
- Slow-delivery and distributed exchange of cryoprotective agents with hydrogel beads.Cryobiology · 2021Article
- Cryopreservation of NK and T Cells Without DMSO for Adoptive Cell-Based Immunotherapy.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2021Review
- Article
- A Retrospective Analysis: Autologous Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Combined With Adoptive T-Cell Therapy for the Treatment of High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma in Ten Dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- Article
- Gastrointestinal Adverse Effects of Immunotherapeutic Agents: A Systematic Review.Gastroenterology research · 2020Review
- Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of lymphoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND
aimsThe Food and Drug Administration (FDA) currently recommends at least 4 h of recipient monitoring after T cell infusions to detect early infusion reactions. Recent catastrophic reactions to 'first-in-man' biologic agents have emphasized the importance of this rule for initial studies of new products. The value of such monitoring for better established agents is less obvious.
methodsWe reviewed infusion-related adverse events (AE) following administration of ex vivo-expanded T cell products (antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes, allodepleted T cells, and genetically modified T cells) on investigational new drug (IND) studies in our center.
resultsFrom 1998 to 2008, we infused 381 T cell products to 180 recipients, enrolled on 18 studies, receiving T cells targeting malignancies or post-transplant viral infections. There were no grade 3-4 infusion reactions during initial monitoring or 24-h follow-up. Twenty-four mild (grade 1-2) AE occurred in 21 infusions either during or immediately following infusion (up to 6 h), most commonly nausea and vomiting (10/24, 41.6%), probably because of the dimethyl sulfoxide cryoprotectant, and hypotension (20.8%), attributable to diphenhydramine pre-medication. Twenty-two additional non-severe events were reported within 24 h of infusion, most commonly culture-negative fever, chills and nausea. An increased risk of adverse events was associated with age [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-1.00, P = 0.05], while an increased risk of immediate infusion-related events was higher in patients reporting allergies (IRR 2.72, 95% CI 1.00-7.40, P = 0.05); sex, disease type and T cell source (allogeneic or autologous) had no effect on frequency of adverse events.
conclusionsInfusion of these T cell products was safe in the outpatient setting and associated with no severe reactions, so monitoring for 1 h after infusion is probably sufficient. As many of the AE were attributable to diphenhydramine premedication, a lower dose (0.25 mg/kg) should be selected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.