ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2010
Mucositis does not lead to false-positivity of the Platelia Aspergillus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We are reporting a study evaluating the crossover of antigens reacting in Platelia Aspergillus (PA) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) from faeces to vessels during mucositis as a possible cause of false-positivity of this test. In our series of 102 episodes of different grades of mucositis, we found strong reactivity of faeces in the PA ELISA test irrespective of the grade of mucositis, the percentage of oral food intake or the presence of total parenteral nutrition. However, none of the patients included in the study were positive in the serum (when the criterion of two samples with cut-off index of positivity [IP] > 0.5 was used).
Indexed as
Identifiers
20428909What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.