Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20428506›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2010

Grouping and classifying electrophysiologically-defined classes of neocortical neurons by single cell, whole-genome expression profiling.

Tatiana Subkhankulova, Kojiro Yano, Hugh P C Robinson, Frederick J Livesey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Patch-seq: Past, Present, and Future.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Assessing Transcriptome Quality in Patch-Seq Datasets.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Single-cell RNA-Seq of Defined Subsets of Retinal Ganglion Cells.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Cell type-specific transcriptome profiling in mammalian brains.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cell type-specific transcriptomics in the brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tatiana SubkhankulovaGurdon Institute and Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge Cambridge, UK.
Kojiro Yano
Hugh P C Robinson
Frederick J Livesey
Wellcome/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diversity of neuronal cell types and how to classify them are perennial questions in neuroscience. The advent of global gene expression analysis raised the possibility that comprehensive transcription profiling will resolve neuronal cell types into groups that reflect some or all aspects of their phenotype. This approach has been successfully used to compare gene expression between groups of neurons defined by a common property. Here we extend this approach to ask whether single neuron gene expression profiling can prospectively resolve neuronal subtypes into groups, independent of any phenotypic information, and whether those groups reflect meaningful biological properties of those neurons. We applied methods we have developed to compare gene expression among single neural stem cells to study global gene expression in 18 randomly picked neurons from layer II/III of the early postnatal mouse neocortex. Cells were selected by morphology and by firing characteristics and electrical properties, enabling the definition of each cell as either fast- or regular-spiking, corresponding to a class of inhibitory interneurons or excitatory pyramidal cells. Unsupervised clustering of young neurons by global gene expression resolved the cells into two groups and those broadly corresponded with the two groups of fast- and regular-spiking neurons. Clustering of the entire, diverse group of 18 neurons of different developmental stages also successfully grouped neurons in accordance with the electrophysiological phenotypes, but with more cells misassigned among groups. Genes specifically enriched in regular spiking neurons were identified from the young neuron expression dataset. These results provide a proof of principle that single-cell gene expression profiling may be used to group and classify neurons in a manner reflecting their known biological properties and may be used to identify cell-specific transcripts.

Indexed as

classificationexpression analysisfiring propertiesinterneuronneocortexpyramidal cell

Identifiers

PMID20428506
PMCPMC2859851
OpenAlexW2092312720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.