Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20428367›Full record

Trial reportBulletin of the World Health Organization2010

Cost-effectiveness of skin-barrier-enhancing emollients among preterm infants in Bangladesh.

Amnesty LeFevre, Samuel D Shillcutt, Samir K Saha, A S M Nawshad Uddin Ahmed, Saifuddin Ahmed, Mak Azad Chowdhury, Paul A Law, Robert Black, Mathuram Santosham, Gary L Darmstadt

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Alternative, Complementary, and Forgotten Remedies for Atopic Dermatitis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neonatal hypothermia in low resource settings: a review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amnesty LeFevreDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America.
Samuel D Shillcutt
Samir K Saha
A S M Nawshad Uddin Ahmed
Saifuddin Ahmed
Mak Azad Chowdhury
Paul A Law
Robert Black
Mathuram Santosham
Gary L Darmstadt
Dhaka Shishu Hospital · BDJohns Hopkins University · USKennedy Krieger Institute · US

Funding

Research Infrastructure for the Hopkins Population CenterR24HD042854 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HAO, LINGXIN · 2003 to 2017
$5.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of topical emollients, sunflower seed oil (SSO) and synthetic Aquaphor, versus no treatment, in preventing mortality among hospitalized preterm infants (< 33 weeks gestation) at a tertiary hospital in Bangladesh.

methodsEvidence from a randomized controlled efficacy trial was evaluated using standard Monte Carlo simulation. Programme costs were obtained from a retrospective review of activities. Patient costs were collected from patient records. Health outcomes were calculated as deaths averted and discounted years of life lost (YLLs) averted. Results were deemed cost-effective if they fell below a ceiling ratio based on the per capita gross national income of Bangladesh (United States dollars, US$ 470).

findingsAquaphor and SSO were both highly cost-effective relative to control, reducing neonatal mortality by 26% and 32%, respectively. SSO cost US$ 61 per death averted and US$ 2.15 per YLL averted (I$ 6.39, international dollars, per YLL averted). Aquaphor cost US$ 162 per death averted and US$ 5.74 per YLL averted (I$ 17.09 per YLL averted). Results were robust to sensitivity analysis. Aquaphor was cost-effective relative to SSO with 77% certainty: it cost an incremental US$ 26 more per patient treated, but averted 1.25 YLLs (US$ 20.74 per YLL averted).

conclusionTopical therapy with SSO or Aquaphor was highly cost-effective in reducing deaths from infection among the preterm neonates studied. The choice of emollient should be made taking into account budgetary limitations and ease of supply. Further research is warranted on additional locally available emollients, use of emollients in community-based settings and generalizability to other geographic regions.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureAdministration, TopicalBangladeshCost-Benefit AnalysisEmollientsHumansInfant, NewbornMassageMonte Carlo MethodPlant OilsSunflower OilEmollientsPlant OilsSunflower Oil

Identifiers

PMID20428367
PMCPMC2814477
OpenAlexW2130716569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.