ArticleJournal of biological physics and chemistry : JBPC2005
The theoretical basis of universal identification systems for bacteria and viruses.
Article in Journal of biological physics and chemistry : JBPC, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is shown that the presence/absence pattern of 1000 random oligomers of length 12-13 in a bacterial genome is sufficiently characteristic to readily and unambiguously distinguish any known bacterial genome from any other. Even genomes of extremely closely-related organisms, such as strains of the same species, can be thus distinguished. One evident way to implement this approach in a practical assay is with hybridization arrays. It is envisioned that a single universal array can be readily designed that would allow identification of any bacterium that appears in a database of known patterns. We performed in silico experiments to test this idea. Calculations utilizing 105 publicly-available completely-sequenced microbial genomes allowed us to determine appropriate values of the test oligonucleotide length, n, and the number of probe sequences. Randomly chosen n-mers with a constant G + C content were used to form an in silico array and verify (a) how many n-mers from each genome would hybridize on this chip, and (b) how different the fingerprints of different genomes would be. With the appropriate choice of random oligomer length, the same approach can also be used to identify viral or eukaryotic genomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.