Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20428289›Full record

ArticleReviews in urology2010

A comparative review of oxybutynin chloride formulations: pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in overactive bladder.

Michael J Kennelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in urology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Polypharmacy Results in Functional Impairment in Mice: Novel Insights Into Age and Sex Interactions.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. MetabolicMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Oxybutynin: past, present, and future.International urogynecology journal · 2013
    Review
  12. Management of urinary incontinence.P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management · 2012
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael J KennellyMcKay Department of Urology, Carolinas Medical Center Charlotte, NC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimuscarinic agents remain the mainstay of treatment of overactive bladder. However, the utility of some of these agents is limited due to tolerability concerns, multiple daily dosage regimens, lack of formulary coverage, and high cost. This can lead to problems with long-term compliance and may preclude optimal management. Oxybutynin has been the most widely prescribed antimuscarinic agent for more than 30 years. To meet the needs of tolerability and compliance, oxybutynin has evolved from an immediate-release pill to a once-daily oral dose and is now available as a topical gel. This review compares the various oxybutynin formulations in terms of pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and tolerability issues.

Indexed as

N-desethyloxybutyninOveractive bladderOxybutyninUrge incontinence

Identifiers

PMID20428289
PMCPMC2859137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.