Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20428251›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Temporal characterization of homology-independent centromere coupling in meiotic prophase.

David Obeso, Dean S Dawson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Diffusion and distal linkages govern interchromosomal dynamics during meiotic prophase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. DNA Helicase Mph1Developmental cell · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Evidence ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The meiotic checkpoint network: step-by-step through meiotic prophase.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David ObesoCell Cycle and Cancer Biology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States of America.
Dean S Dawson
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

Segregation of error-prone chromosomes in meiosisR01GM075363 · NIGMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI DAWSON, DEAN S · 2006 to 2010
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM75363NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past thirty years several reports of the pairing or association of non-homologous centromeres during meiotic prophase have appeared in the literature. Recently, the homology-independent pairwise association of centromeres, termed centromere coupling, was also reported in budding yeast. It seems paradoxical that centromeres would pair with non-homologous partners during a process intended to align homologous chromosomes, yet the conservation of this phenomenon across a wide range of species suggests it may play an important role in meiosis. PRINCIPAL

findingsTo better define the role of this phenomenon in budding yeast, experiments were preformed to place centromere coupling within the context of landmark meiotic events. Soon after the initiation of the meiotic program, centromeres were found to re-organize from a single cluster into non-homologous couples. Centromere coupling is detected as soon as chromosome replication is finished and persists while the recombination protein Dmc1 is loaded onto the chromosomes, suggesting that centromere coupling persists through the time of double strand break formation. In the absence of the synaptonemal complex component, Zip1, centromere coupling was undetectable, at all times examined, confirming the essential role of this protein on this process. Finally, the timely release of centromere coupling depends on the recombination-initiating enzyme, Spo11, suggesting a connection between events in homologous pairing/recombination and the regulation of centromere coupling.

conclusionsBased on our results we propose a role for centromere coupling in blocking interactions between homologous centromeres as recombination initiation is taking place.

Indexed as

Meiotic Prophase ICentromereEndodeoxyribonucleasesFungal ProteinsMeiosisMeiotic Recombination Protein SPO11Recombination, GeneticSaccharomycetalesTime FactorsEndodeoxyribonucleasesFungal ProteinsMeiotic Recombination Protein SPO11

Identifiers

PMID20428251
PMCPMC2859069
OpenAlexW2013936241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.