ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2010
Automation in the high-throughput selection of random combinatorial libraries--different approaches for select applications.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Navigating a 1E+60 Chemical Space of Peptide/Peptoid Oligomers.Molecular informatics · 2025Article
- Engineering biology and automation-Replicability as a design principle.Engineering biology · 2024Review
- Construction of a Calibration Curve for Lycopene on a Liquid-Handling Platform─Wider Lessons for the Development of Automated Dilution Protocols.ACS synthetic biology · 2024Article
- Recent progress in aptamer-based microfluidics for the detection of circulating tumor cells and extracellular vesicles.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2023Review
- Synthesis of fluorescence labelled aptamers for use as low-cost reagents in HIV/AIDS research and diagnostics.Biomedical reports · 2022Article
- Review
- Molecular Elucidation of Disease Biomarkers at the Interface of Chemistry and Biology.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2017Article
- MIPs and Aptamers for Recognition of Proteins in Biomimetic Sensing.Biosensors · 2016Review
- Progress and Challenges in Developing Aptamer-Functionalized Targeted Drug Delivery Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015Review
- Antibody phage display libraries: contributions to oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2012Review
- Design and screening of M13 phage display cDNA libraries.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2011Review
- Probing the SELEX process with next-generation sequencing.PloS one · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automation in combination with high throughput screening methods has revolutionised molecular biology in the last two decades. Today, many combinatorial libraries as well as several systems for automation are available. Depending on scope, budget and time, a different combination of library and experimental handling might be most effective. In this review we will discuss several concepts of combinatorial libraries and provide information as what to expect from these depending on the given context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.