ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2010
Multicenter collaborative study for standardization of Candida albicans genotyping using a polymorphic microsatellite marker.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Markers Reveal Epidemiological Patterns and Evolutionary Histories of the Human PathogenicFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Review
- Comparison of MultiLocus Sequence Typing (MLST) and Microsatellite Length Polymorphism (MLP) forComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Article
- Investigating Clinical Issues by Genotyping of Medically Important Fungi: Why and How?Clinical microbiology reviews · 2017Review
- Article
- Multilocus microsatellite markers for molecular typing of Candida tropicalis isolates.BMC microbiology · 2014Article
- Analysis of strain relatedness using high resolution melting in a case of recurrent candiduria.BMC microbiology · 2013Article
- Molecular fingerprints to identify Candida species.BioMed research international · 2013Review
- Candida spp. with acquired echinocandin resistance, France, 2004-2010.Emerging infectious diseases · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microsatellite-based genotyping for Candida albicans can give discrepant results between laboratories when expressed in fragment sizes, because their determination depends on electrophoretic conditions. The interlaboratory reproducibility was assessed in six laboratories provided with an allelic ladder. Despite variations in size determinations, alleles were correctly assigned, making data transportable between laboratories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.