Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20427010›Full record

ReviewThe ocular surface2010

Pathogenesis of acanthamoeba keratitis.

Noorjahan Panjwani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The ocular surface, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Implication of Horizontal Gene Transfer BetweenPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Oxidative Stress and Redox Imbalance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Anti-Scientifica · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Acanthamoeba keratitis: from pathophysiology to prevention, a contemporary clinical perspective.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Epidemiology of and Genetic Factors Associated withPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Microbiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Therapeutic keratoplasty for severe Acanthamoeba keratitis: risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes of postoperative recurrence.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noorjahan PanjwaniDepartments of Ophthalmology and Biochemistry, The New England Eye Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Noorjahan.panjwani@tufts.edu
Tufts University · US

Funding

PATHOGENESIS OF ACANTHAMOEBA KERATITISR01EY009349 · NEI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI PANJWANI, NOORJAHAN · 1993 to 2013
$3.4M
NEI NIH HHS EY09349NEI NIH HHS R01 EY009349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is a serious infection of the cornea. At present, diagnosis of the disease is not straightforward and treatment is very demanding. While contact lens wear is the leading risk factor for A K, Acanthamoeba parasites are increasingly recognized as an important cause of keratitis in non-contact lens wearers. The first critical step in the pathogenesis of infection is the adhesion of the microbe to the surface of the host tissues. Acanthamoebae express a major virulence protein, the mannose-binding protein (MBP), which mediates the adhesion of amoebae to the surface of the cornea. The MBP is a transmembrane protein with characteristics of a typical cell surface receptor. Subsequent to the MBP-mediated adhesion to host cells, the amoebae produce a contact-dependent metalloproteinase and several contact-independent serine proteinases. These proteinases work in concert to produce a potent cytopathic effect (CPE ) involving killing of the host cells, degradation of epithelial basement membrane and underlying stromal matrix, and penetration into the deeper layers of the cornea. In the hamster animal model, oral immunization with the recombinant MBP protects against AK, and this protection is associated with an increased level of anti-MBP IgA in tears of protected animals. Normal human tear fluid contains IgA antibodies against Acanthamoeba MBP that is likely to provide protection by inhibiting the adhesion of parasites to host cells. Indeed, in in vitro CPE assays, even a low concentration of tears (10 microL of undiluted tears per milliliter of media) almost completely inhibits Acanthamoeba-induced CPE . In addition to adherence-inhibiting, IgA-mediated protection, human tears also contain IgA-independent factors that provide protection against Acanthamoeba-induced CPE by inhibiting the activity of cytotoxic proteinases. Characterization of the CPE-inhibitory factors of human tears should lead to a better understanding of the mechanism by which the tissues of the host resist the infection and also help decode circumstances that predispose to Acanthamoeba infections.

Indexed as

AcanthamoebaAcanthamoeba KeratitisAnimalsCell AdhesionCorneaHumansMannose-Binding LectinProtozoan ProteinsMannose-Binding LectinProtozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20427010
PMCPMC3072032
OpenAlexW2160944345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.