Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20426858›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2010

Noncutaneous malignant melanoma: a prognostic model from a retrospective multicenter study.

Hyo Song Kim, Eun Kyoung Kim, Hyun Jung Jun, Sung Yong Oh, Keon Woo Park, Do Hyoung Lim, Soon Il Lee, Jung Han Kim, Kyoung Mee Kim, Dae Ho Lee and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Primary retromolar malignant melanoma in a Latin American patient.The Journal of international medical research · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Retrospective multicenter evaluation of patients diagnosed with mucosal melanoma: a study of Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hyo Song KimDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Eun Kyoung Kim
Hyun Jung Jun
Sung Yong Oh
Keon Woo Park
Do Hyoung Lim
Soon Il Lee
Jung Han Kim
Kyoung Mee Kim
Dae Ho Lee
Jeeyun Lee
Dankook University · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRAsan Medical Center · KRSungkyunkwan University · KRDong-A University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe performed multicenter study to define clinical characteristics of noncutaneous melanomas and to establish prognostic factors patients who received curative resection.

methodsOf the 141 patients who were diagnosed of non-cutaneous melanoma at 4 institutions in Korea between June 1992 and May 2005, 129 (91.5%) satisfied the selection criteria.

resultsOf the 129 noncutaneous melanoma patients, 14 patients had ocular melanoma and 115 patients had mucosal melanoma. For mucosal melanoma, anorectum was the most common anatomic site (n=39, 30.2%) which was followed by nasal cavity (n=30, 23.3%), genitourinary (n=21, 16.3%), oral cavity (n=14, 10.9%), upper gastrointestinal tract (n=6, 4.7%) and maxillary sinus (n=5, 3.9%) in the order of frequency. With the median 64.5 (range 4.3-213.0) months follow-up, the median overall survival were 24.4 months (95% CI 13.2-35.5) for all patients, and 34.6 (95% CI 24.5-44.7) months for curatively resected mucosal melanoma patients. Adverse prognostic factors of survival for 87 curatively resected mucosal melanoma patients were complete resection (R1 resection margin), and age>50 years. For 14 ocular melanoma, Survival outcome was much better than mucosal melanoma with 73.3% of 2 year OS and 51.2 months of median OS (P=.04).

conclusionPrognosis differed according to primary sites of noncutaneous melanoma. Based on our study, noncutaneous melanoma patients should be treated differently to improve survival outcome.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinomaChemotherapy, AdjuvantEye NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMucous MembraneNeoplasm StagingProportional Hazards ModelsRadiotherapy, Adjuvant

Identifiers

PMID20426858
PMCPMC2880296
OpenAlexW2059903228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.