ArticleBMC systems biology2010
OptORF: Optimal metabolic and regulatory perturbations for metabolic engineering of microbial strains.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 216 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Metabolite coupling analysis and metabolite-flux coupling analysis of genome-scale metabolic models.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Data-driven synthetic microbes for sustainable future.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Review
- Systems biology approach for enhancing limonene yield by re-engineering Escherichia coli.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Uses of Multi-Objective Flux Analysis for Optimization of Microbial Production of Secondary Metabolites.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Minireview: Engineering evolution to reconfigure phenotypic traits in microbes for biotechnological applications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Genome-scale metabolic network models: from first-generation to next-generation.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Constraint-Based Reconstruction and Analyses of Metabolic Models: Open-Source Python Tools and Applications to Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Quantitative prediction of conditional vulnerabilities in regulatory and metabolic networks using PRIME.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2021Article
- GeneReg: a constraint-based approach for design of feasible metabolic engineering strategies at the gene level.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Modelling microbial communities: Harnessing consortia for biotechnological applications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Towards a Systems Biology Approach to Understanding the Lichen Symbiosis: Opportunities and Challenges of Implementing Network Modelling.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- An extended and generalized framework for the calculation of metabolic intervention strategies based on minimal cut sets.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- The era of big data: Genome-scale modelling meets machine learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling with Protein Expressions of Normal and Cancerous Colorectal Tissues for Oncogene Inference.Metabolites · 2019Article
- Characterizing and ranking computed metabolic engineering strategies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Systems Metabolic Engineering of Escherichia coli Improves Coconversion of Lignocellulose-Derived Sugars.Biotechnology journal · 2019Article
- Genome-driven cell engineering review:Essays in biochemistry · 2019Review
- Comparison of pathway analysis and constraint-based methods for cell factory design.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- OptRAM: In-silico strain design via integrative regulatory-metabolic network modeling.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputational modeling and analysis of metabolic networks has been successful in metabolic engineering of microbial strains for valuable biochemical production. Limitations of currently available computational methods for metabolic engineering are that they are often based on reaction deletions rather than gene deletions and do not consider the regulatory networks that control metabolism. Due to the presence of multi-functional enzymes and isozymes, computational designs based on reaction deletions can sometimes result in strategies that are genetically complicated or infeasible. Additionally, strains might not be able to grow initially due to regulatory restrictions. To overcome these limitations, we have developed a new approach (OptORF) for identifying metabolic engineering strategies based on gene deletion and overexpression.
resultsHere we propose an effective method to systematically integrate transcriptional regulatory networks and metabolic networks. This allows for the formulation of linear optimization problems that search for metabolic and/or regulatory perturbations that couple biomass and biochemical production, thus proposing adaptive evolutionary strain designs. Using genome-scale models of Escherichia coli, we have implemented the OptORF algorithm (which considers gene deletions and transcriptional regulation) and compared its metabolic engineering strategies for ethanol production to those found using OptKnock (which considers reaction deletions). Our results found that the reaction-based strategies often require more gene deletions to remove the identified reactions (2 more genes than reactions), and result in lethal growth phenotypes when transcriptional regulation is considered (162 out of 200 cases). Finally, we present metabolic engineering strategies for producing ethanol and higher alcohols (e.g. isobutanol) in E. coli using our OptORF approach. We have found common genetic modifications such as deletion of pgi and overexpression of edd, as well as chemical specific strategies for producing different alcohols.
conclusionsBy taking regulatory effects into account, OptORF can propose changes such as the overexpression of metabolic genes or deletion of transcriptional factors, in addition to the deletion of metabolic genes, that may lead to faster evolutionary trajectories. While biofuel production in E. coli is evaluated here, the developed OptORF approach is general and can be applied to optimize the production of different compounds in other biological systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.