ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010
Concept-based query expansion for retrieving gene related publications from MEDLINE.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A critical evaluation of generative query expansion on biomedical literature retrieval.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Research on Literature Clustering Algorithm for Massive Scientific and Technical Literature Query Service.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- A supervised term ranking model for diversity enhanced biomedical information retrieval.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Exploring the Unexplored: Identifying Implicit and Indirect Descriptions of Biomedical Terminologies Based on Multifaceted Weighting Combinations.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2016Article
- A modular framework for biomedical concept recognition.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Leveraging concept-based approaches to identify potential phyto-therapies.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2013Article
- Studying PubMed usages in the field for complex problem solving: Implications for tool design.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology : JASIST · 2013Article
- GO2PUB: Querying PubMed with semantic expansion of gene ontology terms.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2012Article
- PESCADOR, a web-based tool to assist text-mining of biointeractions extracted from PubMed queries.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Article
- SIDEKICK: Genomic data driven analysis and decision-making framework.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in biotechnology and in high-throughput methods for gene analysis have contributed to an exponential increase in the number of scientific publications in these fields of study. While much of the data and results described in these articles are entered and annotated in the various existing biomedical databases, the scientific literature is still the major source of information. There is, therefore, a growing need for text mining and information retrieval tools to help researchers find the relevant articles for their study. To tackle this, several tools have been proposed to provide alternative solutions for specific user requests.
resultsThis paper presents QuExT, a new PubMed-based document retrieval and prioritization tool that, from a given list of genes, searches for the most relevant results from the literature. QuExT follows a concept-oriented query expansion methodology to find documents containing concepts related to the genes in the user input, such as protein and pathway names. The retrieved documents are ranked according to user-definable weights assigned to each concept class. By changing these weights, users can modify the ranking of the results in order to focus on documents dealing with a specific concept. The method's performance was evaluated using data from the 2004 TREC genomics track, producing a mean average precision of 0.425, with an average of 4.8 and 31.3 relevant documents within the top 10 and 100 retrieved abstracts, respectively.
conclusionsQuExT implements a concept-based query expansion scheme that leverages gene-related information available on a variety of biological resources. The main advantage of the system is to give the user control over the ranking of the results by means of a simple weighting scheme. Using this approach, researchers can effortlessly explore the literature regarding a group of genes and focus on the different aspects relating to these genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.