Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20426495›Full record

ArticleDrugs2010

Management of invasive candidiasis in the intensive care unit.

E Geoffrey Playford, Jeff Lipman, Tania C Sorrell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E Geoffrey PlayfordInfection Management Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. geoffrey_playford@health.qld.gov.au
Jeff Lipman
Tania C Sorrell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive candidiasis (IC) is an important infection in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting given its association with poor clinical outcomes. The epidemiology of IC is complex and, although incompletely elucidated, is characterized by considerable regional and temporal variability. Overall, there appears to be an increase in the incidence of IC and a change in distribution of the causative Candida spp. Of particular concern is an increase in the proportion of episodes caused by Candida glabrata, which is associated with reduced susceptibility to azole antifungal agents. The management of IC has been aided by the availability of several new antifungal agents. In particular, given their broad spectrum of activity and low toxicity, the use of echinocandins as first-line therapy is increasing, especially in settings where fluconazole-resistant Candida spp. are prevalent. Fluconazole remains a reliable agent where an azole-susceptible pathogen is confirmed or in settings where resistance is uncommon. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B are now generally reserved as second-line or salvage therapy. Voriconazole and posaconazole currently enjoy limited use for IC in the ICU setting. Although the poor outcomes associated with IC are, in part, related to the severity of underlying host factors, it is clear that optimization of treatment-related factors is also important. In particular, the speed of initiation of antifungal therapy and the achievement of pharmacodynamic parameters both influence outcomes. The most difficult challenge is early initiation of an effective antifungal drug, given the slow turnaround time and lack of sensitivity of conventional culture-based diagnostic techniques. New approaches, such as non-culture-based assays and/or clinical risk-predictive models are required to better target prophylactic, pre-emptive and empirical antifungal strategies.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsAnimalsAntifungal AgentsCandidaCandidiasisDrug Administration ScheduleHumansAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.