Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20425607›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2010

Biology and therapy of neoplastic meningitis.

Aaron G Mammoser, Morris D Groves

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Neoplastic meningitis due to colorectal cancer.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Neoplastic meningitis in solid tumors: from diagnosis to personalized treatments.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. How to recognize and treat neoplastic meningitis.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aaron G MammoserDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Box 431, Houston, TX 77030, USA. AGMammoser@mdanderson.org
Morris D Groves
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoplastic meningitis (NM) occurs in 5% to 8% of cancer patients, commonly as an end-stage process in previously metastatic disease. As newer therapeutics extend patient survival by maintaining long-term control of systemic malignancies, the incidence of NM is likely to rise. This can be expected both because of a change in the natural history of the underlying disease and the generally poor penetrance of many newer anticancer drugs into the central nervous system, thereby creating a sanctuary site for malignant cells. Currently available treatments have provided limited benefit in overall survival in NM, although long-term survival does occur. Because of the morbidity occasionally associated with treatment, prognostic indicators are being analyzed to identify patients who may benefit from systemic and/or intrathecal therapy before making the decision to initiate treatment. Additionally, because of the relative insensitivity of traditional cerebrospinal fluid analysis, new markers of NM are being investigated. This endeavor is being aided by ongoing research into the underlying biology of the metastatic process.

Indexed as

Combined Modality TherapyHumansMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningitis

Identifiers

PMID20425607
OpenAlexW1964209492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.