Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20425523›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2010

Theories of the pathogenesis of inclusion body myositis.

Steven A Greenberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Immune and myodegenerative pathomechanisms in inclusion body myositis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Emerging therapeutic options for sporadic inclusion body myositis.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2015
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. [New aspects on the pathogenesis of myositis].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2013
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Novel therapeutic approaches for inclusion body myositis.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Steven A GreenbergDepartment of Neurology, Division of Neuromuscular Disease, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Children's Hospital Informatics Program, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA. sagreenberg@partners.org

Funding

Gene Expression in Inflammatory MyopathiesR01NS043471 · NINDS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GREENBERG, STEVEN A · 2003 to 2005
$1.1M
Proteomic Studies in Inclusion Body MyositisR21NS057225 · NINDS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI GREENBERG, STEVEN A · 2008 to 2009
$433k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS043471NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS057225NINDS NIH HHS R21NS057225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inclusion body myositis is a progressive disease of the skeletal muscle. Here, specific theories of its pathogenesis are reviewed and general considerations pertaining to modeling of this disease discussed. Understanding of inclusion body myositis disease mechanism remains extremely poor. Current published animal models do not represent the disease. Future studies need to consider the critical role of biomarkers and methodologic issues in their discovery.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersDisease Models, AnimalHumansMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMyositis, Inclusion BodySkinBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID20425523
PMCPMC2929917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.