ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2010
Occupational rhinitis and asthma: where do we stand, where do we go?
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synergistic Impact of Nasal Irrigation and Health Education in Reducing Chronic Rhinosinusitis Among Cement Plant Workers: a Randomized Controlled Trial.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2025Trial
- Occupational Rhinitis: Classification, Diagnosis, and Therapeutics.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2019Review
- International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2018Article
- Occupational rhinitis: an update.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2015Review
- Patterns of suspected wheat-related allergy: a retrospective single-centre case note review in 156 patients.Clinical and translational allergy · 2014Article
- Chemical and biological work-related risks across occupations in Europe: a review.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2014Review
- Occupational asthma and occupational rhinitis: the united airways disease model revisited.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2013Article
- Occupational asthma: new low-molecular-weight causal agents, 2000-2010.Journal of allergy · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review provides an overview of current and emerging issues regarding occupational rhinitis (OR) and occupational asthma (OA), focusing on studies discussing concepts and results that are relevant to both diseases. OA and OR are conditions that affect the upper and lower airways, are characterized by reduced airway caliber and hyperresponsiveness and by inflammation, and are caused by agents present in the workplace. To explain disease expression, research is moving from the T-helper type 1/type 2 cells paradigm to consider the contribution of diverse alternative pathways such as neural inflammation, a dysfunctional epithelial barrier, and autoimmune mechanisms, among others. Objective assessment of OR and OA has been improved and tested for research and, currently, clinical application. Further developments in the field of OR are expected to lead to more generalized clinical applications, following the example of what has been achieved for OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.