Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20425430›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2009

Infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Lessons learned and future directions.

Rob Pieters

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biology of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Glutathione-s-transferase and CYP1A1*2A polymorphisms in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients.Indian journal of medical and paediatric oncology : official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric Oncology · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rob PietersErasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Dr. Molewaterplein 60, 3015GJ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. rob.pieters@erasmusmc.nl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in older children, ALL in infants has a dismal outcome because rearrangements of the mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) gene occur in about 80% of these patients, leading to an aggressive type of leukemia. With most recent therapies, about 50% long-term event-free survival is achieved, but early bone marrow relapse remains a major problem. Early intensification of chemotherapy and new innovative therapies are necessary to improve outcome. Bone marrow transplantation should be limited to a small subset of well-recognized ALL patients with a very poor prognosis. New genetic and epigenetic insights into the biology of MLL-rearranged ALL suggest new possibilities for therapies.

Indexed as

Gene RearrangementAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBone Marrow TransplantationCombined Modality TherapyForecastingHumansInfantMyeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia ProteinPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaSurvival AnalysisMyeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia Protein

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.