Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20425421›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2009

Treatment of relapsed and refractory myeloma.

Jonathan Kaufman, Charise Gleason, Sagar Lonial

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan KaufmanWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road,Building C, Room 4004, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Charise Gleason
Sagar Lonial
Emory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment options for patients with relapsed and refractory myeloma have dramatically changed as a result of the approval of bortezomib, thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib/liposomal doxorubicin by the US Food and Drug Administration. These changes have resulted in improved responses to salvage therapy and, in many cases, improved overall survival. The challenge for clinicians is choosing which agent to use and deciding whether a single agent or combination therapy is the optimal treatment option for each patient. This article outlines some of the data underpinning the use of bortezomib, thalidomide, lenalidomide, or combinations of these agents in the setting of relapsed myeloma, as well as a number of potential future agents or combinations that may improve outcomes for patients with relapsed and refractory disease.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBoronic AcidsBortezomibDexamethasoneDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansLenalidomideMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPyrazinesThalidomideAntineoplastic AgentsBoronic AcidsBortezomibDexamethasoneLenalidomidePyrazinesThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID20425421
OpenAlexW1979322286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.