Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20425394›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2010

New agents in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Thomas S Lin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A Comparison of Cytotoxic Effects ofIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Thomas S LinGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA 19426, USA. thomas.s.lin@gsk.com
GlaxoSmithKline (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in treatment, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) remains incurable with standard therapies. Novel therapeutic agents are needed, particularly for patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities such as del(17p13). The past year has seen several advances in this field. The immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide and the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol demonstrated clinical activity in fludarabine-refractory CLL patients with high-risk cytogenetic features and bulky lymphadenopathy, but they were associated with toxicities such as tumor flare and tumor lysis. Second-generation monoclonal anti-CD20 antibodies in clinical trials include ofatumumab, which demonstrated activity in fludarabine-refractory patients with bulky lymphadenopathy. Oblimersen, obatoclax, and ABT-263 target the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2. Investigational agents with novel therapeutic targets include the anti-CD37 small modular immunopharmaceutical TRU-016, the oral spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) inhibitor fostamatinib, and the oral phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor CAL-101; all of these have all shown preliminary evidence of clinical activity. The development of novel agents for treating CLL remains an active, exciting area of research.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDrug Delivery SystemsDrugs, InvestigationalFlavonoidsHumansImmunologic FactorsLenalidomideLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellNeoplasm ProteinsPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2ThalidomidealvocidibAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsDrugs, InvestigationalFlavonoidsImmunologic FactorsLenalidomideNeoplasm ProteinsPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Thalidomide

Identifiers

PMID20425394
OpenAlexW1993448640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.