Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20425392›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2010

New drugs for the treatment of myelofibrosis.

Ruben A Mesa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ruben A MesaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA. mesa.ruben@mayo.edu
Mayo Clinic Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing patients with myelofibrosis (MF)-either those with primary MF or those whose MF has evolved from antecedent polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia-presents many challenges to the hematologist. Cure is potentially achievable through allogeneic stem cell transplantation, but this therapy is either inappropriate or not feasible for most patients. MF patients suffer from a range of debilitating disease manifestations (eg, massive splenomegaly, cytopenias, constitutional symptoms, and transformation to a treatment-refractory blast phase). Currently available therapies are palliative but can be of significant value to some MF patients for anemia, splenomegaly, or sometimes both manifestations. New medical therapies for MF revolve around three main themes: immunomodulation (to assist anemia), hypomethylation strategies, and (the most robust pipeline) the use of targeted JAK2 inhibitors. These latter agents have shown the ability to improve MF-associated splenomegaly and MF-associated symptoms but do not improve (and may exacerbate) anemia or thrombocytopenia. Future targeted agents, and perhaps combinations of agents that currently show complementary benefits, are anticipated to further enhance the efficacy of medical therapy for MF.

Indexed as

AnemiaClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyDNA MethylationDrugs, InvestigationalHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansImmunologic FactorsJanus Kinase 2Palliative CarePrimary MyelofibrosisProtein Kinase InhibitorsSplenomegalyThrombocytopeniaTreatment OutcomeDrugs, InvestigationalImmunologic FactorsJAK2 protein, humanJanus Kinase 2Protein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID20425392
OpenAlexW2063707388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.