Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20425200›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2010

Strategies for the prevention and management of neonatal and infant pain.

Denise Harrison, Janet Yamada, Bonnie Stevens

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02984098 (40% Orally Administered Dextrose Gel is More Effective Than 25% Dextrose But Not Sufficiently Reliefs Acute Pain in Term Neonates), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02984098 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

40% Orally Administered Dextrose Gel is More Effective Than 25% Dextrose But Not Sufficiently Reliefs Acute Pain in Term Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Targu Mures, RomaniaRan2014 to 2015Enrolled200ConditionsAcute PainArmsDextrose
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Breastfeeding for procedural pain in infants beyond the neonatal period.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Denise HarrisonCentre for Nursing and the Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, University of Toronto, Canada. denise.harrison@utoronto.ca
Janet Yamada
Bonnie Stevens

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health care professionals caring for neonates (birth to 28 days of life) and infants up to 1 year of age have a professional and ethical responsibility to provide safe and effective pain management during painful procedures. Despite 14 years of research reports highlighting that sick infants are exposed to large numbers of painful procedures with minimal or no provision of pain management strategies, and generation of abundant evidence to support effectiveness of pain reduction strategies, insufficient practice changes have been made. As untreated pain in infancy has both immediate and longer-term negative consequences, such as increased sensitivity and responses to subsequent pain, it is imperative that widespread sustained practice changes are made to reduce the burden of pain. This review highlights recent advances within the past 2 to 3 years in pain management of acute procedural pain for neonates and infants, proposes recommendations for future research, and addresses practical implications and challenges for implementing best pain management practices.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineAnalgesicsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNeonatologyPainPediatricsSucroseAnalgesicsSucrose

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.