Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20425035›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2010

Genetics of primary torsion dystonia.

Norbert Brüggemann, Christine Klein

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Invertebrate models of dystonia.Current neuropharmacology · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Alternative approaches to modeling hereditary dystonias.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2012
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Molecular pathways in dystonia.Neurobiology of disease · 2011
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Norbert BrüggemannSchilling Section of Clinical and Molecular Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Christine Klein
University of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in the genetics of dystonia have further elucidated the pathophysiology of this clinically and etiologically heterogeneous group of movement disorders. Currently, 20 monogenic forms of dystonia, designated by the acronym DYT, are grouped as 1) pure dystonias, 2) dystonia-plus syndromes, and 3) paroxysmal dystonias/dyskinesias. We summarize recently discovered genes and loci, including the 1) detection of two primary dystonia genes (DYT6, DYT16), 2) identification of the DYT17 locus, 3) association of a dystonia/dyskinesia phenotype with a gene previously linked to GLUT1 (glucose transporter of the blood-brain barrier) deficiency syndrome (DYT18), 4) designation of paroxysmal kinesigenic and nonkinesigenic dyskinesia as DYT19 and DYT20, and 5) redefinition of DYT14 as DYT5. Further, we review current knowledge regarding genetic modifiers and susceptibility factors. Because recognizing and diagnosing monogenic dystonias have important implications for patients and their families with regard to counseling, prognosis, and treatment, we highlight clinical "red flags" of individual subtypes and review guidelines for genetic testing.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseCarrier ProteinsDystonia Musculorum DeformansGenetic TestingHumansMutationCarrier Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20425035
OpenAlexW1965892871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.