Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20424833›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2010

Testing for selection on synonymous sites in plant mitochondrial DNA: the role of codon bias and RNA editing.

Daniel B Sloan, Douglas R Taylor

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Mitogenome ofBiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Deciphering the mitochondrial genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Mitochondrial DNA Repair in anPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  18. Map-Based Functional Analysis of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  19. Comprehensive Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel B SloanDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA. dbs4a@virginia.edu
Douglas R Taylor

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since plant mitochondrial genomes exhibit some of the slowest known synonymous substitution rates, it is generally believed that they experience exceptionally low mutation rates. However, the use of synonymous substitution rates to infer mutation rates depends on the implicit assumption that synonymous sites are evolving neutrally (or nearly so). To assess the validity of this assumption in plant mitochondrial genomes, we examined coding sequence for footprints of selection acting at synonymous sites. We found that synonymous sites exhibit an AT rich and pyrimidine skewed nucleotide composition compared to both non-synonymous sites and non-coding regions. We also found some evidence for selection associated with both biased codon usage and conservation of regulatory sequences involved in mRNA processing, although some of these findings are subject to alternative non-adaptive interpretations. Regardless, the inferred strength of selection appears too weak to account for the variation in substitution rates between the mitochondrial genomes of plants and other multicellular eukaryotes. Therefore, these results are consistent with the interpretation that plant mitochondrial genomes experience a substantially lower mutation rate rather than increased functional constraints acting on synonymous sites. Nevertheless, there are important nucleotide composition patterns (particularly the differences between synonymous sites and non-coding DNA) that remain largely unexplained.

Indexed as

CodonGenome, MitochondrialGenome, PlantRNA EditingBase CompositionConserved SequenceDNA FingerprintingDNA, MitochondrialEvolution, MolecularPlantsReproducibility of ResultsSelection, GeneticCodonDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.