ArticleBritish journal of cancer2010
Occupation and cancer in Britain.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 260 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breast Cancer and Arsenic Anticancer Effects: Systematic Review of the Experimental Data fromBioMed research international · 2022Pooled it
- Association Between Alcohol Consumption and Risk of Bladder Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Modifiable risk factors for the prevention of bladder cancer: a systematic review of meta-analyses.European journal of epidemiology · 2016Pooled it
- Stomach cancer and occupational exposure to asbestos: a meta-analysis of occupational cohort studies.British journal of cancer · 2015Pooled it
- First-morning urinary melatonin and breast cancer risk in the Guernsey Study.American journal of epidemiology · 2014Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Prostate Cancer in the MENA Region: Attributable Burden of Behavioral and Environmental Exposures.Toxics · 2026Article
- Burden of cancer attributable to six occupational exposures in the Netherlands, 2021: a health impact assessment study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Incidence analysis of occupational respiratory diseases in Türkiye: a cross-sectional legal registry-based study from 2013 to 2023.BMC public health · 2025Article
- A 7-Year Active Surveillance Experience for Occupational Lung Cancer in Bologna, Italy (2017-2023).La Medicina del lavoro · 2025Article
- Carcinogen metabolism and bladder cancer: role of gut microbiota in disease and prevention.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Public attitudes about the support for the establishment of smoke-free environment.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Methodological and Practical Challenges in Synthesizing Occupational Cancer Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Molecular Markers for Bladder Cancer Screening: An Insight into Bladder Cancer and FDA-Approved Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- The global landscape of bladder cancer incidence and mortality in 2020 and projections to 2040.Journal of global health · 2023Article
- Lung cancer mortality attributable to residential radon: a systematic scoping review.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2023Article
- The Prevalence of p16 Expression in Urothelial Bladder Cancer in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Chattogram, Bangladesh.Iranian journal of pathology · 2023Article
- Effects of whole-body vibration on reproductive physiology in a rat model of whole-body vibration.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrioritising control measures for occupationally related cancers should be evidence based. We estimated the current burden of cancer in Britain attributable to past occupational exposures for International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) group 1 (established) and 2A (probable) carcinogens.
methodsWe calculated attributable fractions and numbers for cancer mortality and incidence using risk estimates from the literature and national data sources to estimate proportions exposed.
results5.3% (8019) cancer deaths were attributable to occupation in 2005 (men, 8.2% (6362); women, 2.3% (1657)). Attributable incidence estimates are 13 679 (4.0%) cancer registrations (men, 10 063 (5.7%); women, 3616 (2.2%)). Occupational attributable fractions are over 2% for mesothelioma, sinonasal, lung, nasopharynx, breast, non-melanoma skin cancer, bladder, oesophagus, soft tissue sarcoma, larynx and stomach cancers. Asbestos, shift work, mineral oils, solar radiation, silica, diesel engine exhaust, coal tars and pitches, occupation as a painter or welder, dioxins, environmental tobacco smoke, radon, tetrachloroethylene, arsenic and strong inorganic mists each contribute 100 or more registrations. Industries and occupations with high cancer registrations include construction, metal working, personal and household services, mining, land transport, printing/publishing, retail/hotels/restaurants, public administration/defence, farming and several manufacturing sectors. 56% of cancer registrations in men are attributable to work in the construction industry (mainly mesotheliomas, lung, stomach, bladder and non-melanoma skin cancers) and 54% of cancer registrations in women are attributable to shift work (breast cancer).
conclusionThis project is the first to quantify in detail the burden of cancer and mortality due to occupation specifically for Britain. It highlights the impact of occupational exposures, together with the occupational circumstances and industrial areas where exposures to carcinogenic agents occurred in the past, on population cancer morbidity and mortality; this can be compared with the impact of other causes of cancer. Risk reduction strategies should focus on those workplaces where such exposures are still occurring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.