Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20423340›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2010

Atomoxetine acts as an NMDA receptor blocker in clinically relevant concentrations.

Andrea G Ludolph, Patrick T Udvardi, Ulrike Schaz, Carolin Henes, Oliver Adolph, Henry U Weigt, Joerg M Fegert, Tobias M Boeckers, Karl J Föhr

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Catecholamine-Mediated Increases in Gain Enhance the Precision of Cortical Representations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. P2XThe Journal of physiology · 2018
    Article
  19. Amplification and Suppression of Distinct Brainwide Activity Patterns by Catecholamines.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  20. Genetic Insights Into ADHD Biology.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea G LudolphDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Ulm, Germany. andrea.ludolph@uni-ulm.de <andrea.ludolph@uni-ulm.de>
Patrick T Udvardi
Ulrike Schaz
Carolin Henes
Oliver Adolph
Henry U Weigt
Joerg M Fegert
Tobias M Boeckers
Karl J Föhr
Universität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThere is increasing evidence that not only the monoaminergic but also the glutamatergic system is involved in the pathophysiology of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Hyperactivity of glutamate metabolism might be causally related to a hypoactive state in the dopaminergic system. Atomoxetine, a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, is the first non-stimulant approved for the treatment of this disorder. Here we have evaluated the effects of atomoxetine on glutamate receptors in vitro. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique was used to analyse the effect of atomoxetine on N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in cultured rodent cortical and hippocampal neurons as well as on NMDA receptors heterologously expressed in human TsA cells. KEY

resultsAtomoxetine blocked NMDA-induced membrane currents. Half-maximal inhibition emerged at about 3 microM which is in the range of clinically relevant concentrations found in plasma of patients treated with this drug. The inhibition was voltage-dependent, indicating an open-channel blocking mechanism. Furthermore, the inhibitory potency of atomoxetine did not vary when measured on NMDA receptors from different brain regions or with different subunit compositions. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The effective NMDA receptor antagonism by atomoxetine at low micromolar concentrations may be relevant to its clinical effects in the treatment of ADHD. Our data provide further evidence that altered glutamatergic transmission might play a role in ADHD pathophysiology.

Indexed as

Adrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAnimalsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCell LineCells, CulturedCerebral CortexHippocampusHumansNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPropylaminesRatsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAtomoxetine HydrochloridePropylaminesReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID20423340
PMCPMC2874851
OpenAlexW1530918435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.