Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20421973›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Formulating a historical and demographic model of recent human evolution based on resequencing data from noncoding regions.

Guillaume Laval, Etienne Patin, Luis B Barreiro, Lluís Quintana-Murci

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Evolutionary genetic dissection of human interferons.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2011
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Adult sex ratios and partner scarcity among hunter-gatherers: implications for dispersal patterns and the evolution of human sociality.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Agriculture, population growth, and statistical analysis of the radiocarbon record.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  13. Distance from sub-Saharan Africa predicts mutational load in diverse human genomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Estimating the mutation load in human genomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2015
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guillaume LavalHuman Evolutionary Genetics, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Etienne Patin
Luis B Barreiro
Lluís Quintana-Murci

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstimating the historical and demographic parameters that characterize modern human populations is a fundamental part of reconstructing the recent history of our species. In addition, the development of a model of human evolution that can best explain neutral genetic diversity is required to identify confidently regions of the human genome that have been targeted by natural selection. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe have resequenced 20 independent noncoding autosomal regions dispersed throughout the genome in 213 individuals from different continental populations, corresponding to a total of approximately 6 Mb of diploid resequencing data. We used these data to explore and co-estimate an extensive range of historical and demographic parameters with a statistical framework that combines the evaluation of multiple models of human evolution via a best-fit approach, followed by an Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) analysis. From a methodological standpoint, evaluating the accuracy of the parameter co-estimation allowed us to identify the most accurate set of statistics to be used for the estimation of each of the different historical and demographic parameters characterizing recent human evolution. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results support a model in which modern humans left Africa through a single major dispersal event occurring approximately 60,000 years ago, corresponding to a drastic reduction of approximately 5 times the effective population size of the ancestral African population of approximately 13,800 individuals. Subsequently, the ancestors of modern Europeans and East Asians diverged much later, approximately 22,500 years ago, from the population of ancestral migrants. This late diversification of Eurasians after the African exodus points to the occurrence of a long maturation phase in which the ancestral Eurasian population was not yet diversified.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPopulation DynamicsAfricaAsian PeopleBayes TheoremEmigration and ImmigrationGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGenome, HumanHistoryHistory, AncientHumansRNA, UntranslatedSelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAWhite PeopleRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID20421973
PMCPMC2858654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.