Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20421891›Full record

ReviewCell research2010

Network models for molecular kinetics and their initial applications to human health.

Gregory R Bowman, Xuhui Huang, Vijay S Pande

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Discovery of multiple hidden allosteric sites by combining Markov state models and experiments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  8. Extensive conformational heterogeneity within protein cores.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Equilibrium fluctuations of a single folded protein reveal a multitude of potential cryptic allosteric sites.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Taming the complexity of protein folding.Current opinion in structural biology · 2011
    Review
  17. Simbios: an NIH national center for physics-based simulation of biological structures.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gregory R BowmanBiophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Xuhui Huang
Vijay S Pande

Funding

Physics-based Simulation of Biological Structures(RMI)U54GM072970 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO · 2004 to 2013
$33.5M
Topology, nucleation, and the protein folding barrierR01GM062868 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PANDE, VIJAY S · 2002 to 2018
$5.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062868NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM062868NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM072970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular kinetics underlies all biological phenomena and, like many other biological processes, may best be understood in terms of networks. These networks, called Markov state models (MSMs), are typically built from physical simulations. Thus, they are capable of quantitative prediction of experiments and can also provide an intuition for complex conformational changes. Their primary application has been to protein folding; however, these technologies and the insights they yield are transferable. For example, MSMs have already proved useful in understanding human diseases, such as protein misfolding and aggregation in Alzheimer's disease.

Indexed as

Health StatusKineticsModels, MolecularNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsHumansProteomics

Identifiers

PMID20421891
PMCPMC4441225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.