Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20421601›Full record

ArticleGenetics2010

Effect of translesion DNA polymerases, endonucleases and RpoS on mutation rates in Salmonella typhimurium.

Sanna Koskiniemi, Diarmaid Hughes, Dan I Andersson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sources of spontaneous mutagenesis in bacteria.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2018
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Translesion DNA Synthesis.EcoSal Plus · 2012
    Article
  6. Stress-induced mutation via DNA breaks in Escherichia coli: a molecular mechanism with implications for evolution and medicine.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of a stress-inducible switch to mutagenic repair of DNA breaks on mutation in Escherichia coli.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanna KoskiniemiDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, S-75123 Uppsala, Sweden.
Diarmaid Hughes
Dan I Andersson
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been suggested that bacteria have evolved mechanisms to increase their mutation rate in response to various stresses and that the translesion DNA polymerase Pol IV under control of the LexA regulon and the alternative sigma factor RpoS are involved in regulating this mutagenesis. Here we examined in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2 the rates for four different types of mutations (rifampicin, nalidixic acid, and chlorate resistance and Lac(+) reversion) during various growth conditions and with different levels of four translesion DNA polymerases (Pol II, Pol IV, Pol V, and SamAB) and RpoS. Constitutive derepression of the LexA regulon by a lexA(def) mutation had no effect on Lac(+) reversion rates but increased the other three mutation rates up to 11-fold, and the contribution of the translesion DNA polymerases to this mutagenesis varied with the type of mutation examined. The increase in mutation rates in the lexA(def) mutant required the presence of the LexA-controlled UvrB protein and endonucleases UvrC and Cho. With regard to the potential involvement of RpoS in mutagenesis, neither an increase in RpoS levels conferred by artificial overexpression from a plasmid nor long-term stationary phase incubation or slow growth caused an increase in any of the four mutation rates measured, alone or in combination with overexpression of the translesion DNA polymerases. In conclusion, mutation rates are remarkably robust and no combination of growth conditions, induction of translesion DNA polymerases by inactivation of LexA, or increased RpoS expression could confer an increase in mutation rates higher than the moderate increase caused by derepression of the LexA regulon alone.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialBacterial ProteinsChloratesDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDrug Resistance, BacterialEndonucleasesLexA Repressor ProteinMutagenesisMutationNalidixic AcidNucleic Acid Synthesis InhibitorsRegulonRifampinSalmonella typhimuriumSerine EndopeptidasesSigma FactorBacterial ProteinsChloratesDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseEndonucleasesLexA Repressor ProteinNalidixic AcidNucleic Acid Synthesis InhibitorsRifampinSerine EndopeptidasesSigma Factorsigma factor KatF protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID20421601
PMCPMC2907201
OpenAlexW2155718168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.