Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20421412›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2010

Successful computational prediction of novel imprinted genes from epigenomic features.

Chelsea M Brideau, Kirsten E Eilertson, James A Hagarman, Carlos D Bustamante, Paul D Soloway

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Length Polymorphism and Methylation Status of UPS29 Minisatellite of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Environmental Influences on Genomic Imprinting.Current environmental health reports · 2015
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chelsea M BrideauDivision of Nutritional Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, 211 Weill Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Kirsten E Eilertson
James A Hagarman
Carlos D Bustamante
Paul D Soloway

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN GENETICS AND DEVELOPMENTT32GM007617 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI BARBASH, DANIEL A · 1985 to 2021
$5.5M
Epigenetic Control of a Ras ActivatorR01CA098597 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI SOLOWAY, PAUL D · 2003 to 2011
$2.9M
Epigenomic analysis on a nanoscale deviceR01DA025722 · NIDA · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CRAIGHEAD, HAROLD G, SOLOWAY, PAUL D · 2008 to 2011
$1.5M
Nutrient-Genome Interactions Involved in Colorectal CancerR01CA120870 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI SOLOWAY, PAUL D · 2006 to 2008
$429k
NCI NIH HHS CA120870NCI NIH HHS CA98596NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098597NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120870NIDA NIH HHS DA025722NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025722NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007617NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM007617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 100 mouse genes undergo genomic imprinting, whereby one of the two parental alleles is epigenetically silenced. Imprinted genes influence processes including development, X chromosome inactivation, obesity, schizophrenia, and diabetes, motivating the identification of all imprinted loci. Local sequence features have been used to predict candidate imprinted genes, but rigorous testing using reciprocal crosses validated only three, one of which resided in previously identified imprinting clusters. Here we show that specific epigenetic features in mouse cells correlate with imprinting status in mice, and we identify hundreds of additional genes predicted to be imprinted in the mouse. We used a multitiered approach to validate imprinted expression, including use of a custom single nucleotide polymorphism array and traditional molecular methods. Of 65 candidates subjected to molecular assays for allele-specific expression, we found 10 novel imprinted genes that were maternally expressed in the placenta.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationEpigenesis, GeneticGenomic ImprintingModels, GeneticAnimalsComputational BiologyFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleMiceMolecular Sequence DataOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPlacentaPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID20421412
PMCPMC2897571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.