Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20421377›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2010

Comparison of the moonlighting actions of the two highly homologous chaperonin 60 proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Ana Cehovin, Anthony R M Coates, Yanmin Hu, Yanira Riffo-Vasquez, Peter Tormay, Catherine Botanch, Frederic Altare, Brian Henderson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mechanisms of aPharmaceutics · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Heat Shock Proteins as Immunomodulants.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Molecular basis of mycobacterial survival in macrophages.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017
    Review
  13. Biology open · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana CehovinDepartment of Microbial Diseases, UCL-Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anthony R M Coates
Yanmin Hu
Yanira Riffo-Vasquez
Peter Tormay
Catherine Botanch
Frederic Altare
Brian Henderson
Eastman Dental Hospital · GBSt George's, University of London · GBHelperby Therapeutics (United Kingdom) · GBInserm · FRInstitut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale · FRKing's College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0200049Medical Research Council G0802079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence is emerging that the two chaperonin (Cpn) 60 proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Cpn60.1 and Cpn60.2, have moonlighting actions that may contribute to the pathology of tuberculosis. We studied the release of Cpn60.1 from M. tuberculosis and infected macrophage like cells and compared recombinant Cpn60.1 and Cpn60.2 in a range of cell-based assays to determine how similar the actions of these highly homologous proteins are. We now establish that Cpns are similar as follows: (i) Cpn60.1, as it has been shown for Cpn60.2, is released by M. tuberculosis in culture, and Cpn60.1 is furthermore released when the bacterium is in quiescent, but not activated, macrophage like cells, and (ii) both proteins only showed a partial requirement for MyD88 for the induction of proinflammatory cytokine production compared to lipopolysaccharide. However, we also found major differences in the cellular action of Cpns. (i) Cpn60.2 proved to be a more potent stimulator of whole blood leukocytes than Cpn60.1 and was the only one to induce tumor necrosis factor alpha synthesis. (ii) Cpn60.1 bound to ca. 90% of circulating monocytes compared to Cpn60.2, which bound <50% of these cells. Both chaperonins bound to different cell surface receptors, while monocyte activation by both proteins was completely abrogated in TLR4-/- mice, although Cpn60.2 also showed significant requirement for TLR2. Finally, an isogenic mutant lacking cpn60.1, but containing intact cpn60.2, was severely inhibited in generating multinucleate giant cells in an in vitro human granuloma assay. These results clearly show that, despite significant sequence homology, M. tuberculosis Cpn60 proteins interact in distinct ways with human or murine macrophages.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlotting, WesternCell LineChaperonin 60CytokinesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGenes, BacterialHumansLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsMacrophagesMiceMonocytesMycobacterium tuberculosisRecombinant ProteinsSequence Homology, Amino AcidToll-Like Receptor 2Chaperonin 60CytokinesLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsRecombinant ProteinsToll-Like Receptor 2Toll-Like Receptor 4

Identifiers

PMID20421377
PMCPMC2897374
OpenAlexW2105919599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.