ArticleHaematologica2010
Transcription factor mutations in myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms.
Article in Haematologica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and Prognostic Significance ofCancers · 2026Article
- Array comparative genomic hybridisation in haematological malignancies: A comprehensive review.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2026Review
- Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with NPM1 mutation or acute myeloid leukemia?The oncologist · 2025Review
- AML typical mutations (CEBPA, FLT3, NPM1) identify a high-risk chronic myelomonocytic leukemia independent of CPSS molecular.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management.American journal of hematology · 2024Review
- Infrequent Presentations of ChronicCancers · 2024Review
- Review
- Chronic interleukin-1 exposure triggers selection for Cebpa-knockout multipotent hematopoietic progenitors.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2021Article
- Genomic Landscape and Risk Stratification in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2021Review
- Molecular Pathogenesis ofFrontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Accurate germline RUNX1 variant interpretation and its clinical significance.Blood advances · 2020Article
- Review
- NPM1 Biology in Myeloid Neoplasia.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2020Review
- Role of RUNX Family Transcription Factors in DNA Damage Response.Molecules and cells · 2020Review
- Clinicopathologic and genetic characterization of nonacuteBlood advances · 2019Article
- Article
- Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia associated with myeloid sarcomas andTherapeutic advances in hematology · 2019Article
- Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MDS/MPN) Overlap Syndromes: Molecular Pathogenetic Mechanisms and Their Implications.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2019Review
- Review
- Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management.American journal of hematology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAberrant activation of tyrosine kinases, caused by either mutation or gene fusion, is of major importance for the development of many hematologic malignancies, particularly myeloproliferative neoplasms. We hypothesized that hitherto unrecognized, cytogenetically cryptic tyrosine kinase fusions may be common in non-classical or atypical myeloproliferative neoplasms and related myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms. DESIGN AND
methodsTo detect genomic copy number changes associated with such fusions, we performed a systematic search in 68 patients using custom designed, targeted, high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization. Arrays contained 44,000 oligonucleotide probes that targeted 500 genes including all 90 tyrosine kinases plus downstream tyrosine kinase signaling components, other translocation targets, transcription factors, and other factors known to be important for myelopoiesis.
resultsNo abnormalities involving tyrosine kinases were detected; however, nine cytogenetically cryptic copy number imbalances were detected in seven patients, including hemizygous deletions of RUNX1 or CEBPA in two cases with atypical chronic myeloid leukemia. Mutation analysis of the remaining alleles revealed non-mutated RUNX1 and a frameshift insertion within CEBPA. A further mutation screen of 187 patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms identified RUNX1 mutations in 27 (14%) and CEBPA mutations in seven (4%) patients. Analysis of other transcription factors known to be frequently mutated in acute myeloid leukemia revealed NPM1 mutations in six (3%) and WT1 mutations in two (1%) patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms. Univariate analysis indicated that patients with mutations had a shorter overall survival (28 versus 44 months, P=0.019) compared with patients without mutations, with the prognosis for cases with CEBPA, NPM1 or WT1 mutations being particularly poor.
conclusionsWe conclude that mutations of transcription and other nuclear factors are frequent in myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms and are generally mutually exclusive. CEBPA, NPM1 or WT1 mutations may be associated with a poor prognosis, an observation that will need to be confirmed by detailed prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.