Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20421224›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2010

An international survey of physician and patient understanding, perception, and attitudes to atrial fibrillation and its contribution to cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality.

Etienne Aliot, Günter Breithardt, Josep Brugada, John Camm, Gregory Y H Lip, Panos E Vardas, Markus Wagner, Atrial Fibrillation AWareness And Risk Education group, Atrial Fibrillation Association, European Heart Rhythm Association and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Care and referral patterns in a large, dedicated nurse-led atrial fibrillation outpatient clinic.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Social determinants of atrial fibrillation.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Integrated Care in Atrial Fibrillation: A Road Map to the Future.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2021
    Review
  18. Shared decision-making in atrial fibrillation: patient-reported involvement in treatment decisions.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Etienne AliotBrabois Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France. e.aliot@chu-nancy.fr
Günter Breithardt
Josep Brugada
John Camm
Gregory Y H Lip
Panos E Vardas
Markus Wagner
Atrial Fibrillation AWareness And Risk Education group
Atrial Fibrillation Association
European Heart Rhythm Association
Stroke Alliance for Europe
World Heart Federation

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAtrial fibrillation (AF) is not always perceived as a serious health threat, but is the most common sustained arrhythmia, with a major impact on morbidity, mortality, and patient quality of life (QoL). A survey was undertaken to examine the level of understanding, perception, and attitudes of the cardiovascular risks associated with AF. METHODS AND

resultsThe AF AWARE group (an international coalition of organizations with an interest in AF) conducted an international quantitative survey in 11 countries in 2009, to investigate patients' (n = 825) and cardiologists' (n = 810) perceptions of AF, preferences for communicating information on AF and burden of AF. Both patients and physicians considered AF life-threatening (55 and 43%, respectively). Physicians were more concerned about the risk of stroke and hospitalizations than patients, whereas patients were most concerned about death risk. One in four patients felt unable to explain AF and >33% were worried or fearful about their disease. Many physicians (51%) wanted more patient information with >60% viewing available information as poor/difficult to find. Hospital specialists and GPs were identified as key information sources for patients. Most patients (83%) reported symptoms, yet 75% claimed to be satisfied with AF therapies. Atrial fibrillation patients, often with associated diseases, made an average of nine visits per year to their doctors, who consider AF difficult and time consuming to manage. Patients and physicians rated the QoL impact of AF as moderate to high.

conclusionsA comprehensive international patient and professional information and support programme on AF is needed to improve management and consequently health outcomes.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth SurveysInternational CooperationPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAtrial FibrillationCanadaCardiovascular DiseasesCommunicationCost of IllnessEuropeHumansMiddle AgedMorbidityQuality of LifeRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID20421224
PMCPMC2859877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.