ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2011
Rituximab therapy in lupus nephritis: current clinical evidence.
Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2012Guideline
- American College of Rheumatology guidelines for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis.Arthritis care & research · 2012Guideline
- The efficacy and safety of half-dose glucocorticoids combined with rituximab versus high-dose glucocorticoids for initial treatment of minimal change disease: a single-center experience.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Review
- Lupus Nephritis: A Different Disease in European Patients?Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Review
- Reviewing the recommendations for lupus in children.Current rheumatology reports · 2015Review
- B-cell-depleting therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus.The American journal of medicine · 2012Review
- B-cell targeted therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: potential of rituximab.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2012Article
- Targeting B cells for the treatment of SLE: the beginning of the end or the end of the beginning?Discovery medicine · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complexity of the therapeutic approach in lupus nephritis (LN) is increased by the large number of patients who do not respond to first-line therapies and by relapses after initial clinical remission. The emergence of biological agents has increased the therapeutic armamentarium available in these complex situations, but their use is limited by the lack of licensing. We analysed current evidence on the therapeutic use of rituximab in adult LN patients by systematic analysis of seven observational studies published since 2005 (four in 2009), which included 106 LN patients treated with rituximab. A complete or partial therapeutic response was achieved in 73 (69%) patients. The response according to the type of LN was stated in 79 cases: 8 (80%) patients with type III LN had a favourable, 26 (67%) of those with type IV, 4 (57%) of those with type V and 18 (78%) of those with mixed membranous-proliferative LN. The main factors associated with no response were younger age, black race and lack of CD19(+) cell depletion. The lowest rates of complete response were observed in patients with type V LN, especially those with associated proliferative lesions. Although it is not yet possible to make definite recommendations, the global analysis of these cases supports the off-label use of rituximab in severe, refractory LN cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20419398What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.