Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20419090›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Assessment of the N-PCR assay in diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis: detection of M. tuberculosis in pleural fluid and sputum collected in tandem.

Parameet Kumar, Manas K Sen, Devendra S Chauhan, Vishwa M Katoch, Sarman Singh, Hanumanthappa K Prasad

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Drug Resistance and Molecular Characteristics ofJournal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sputum AFB in tuberculous pleural effusion.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Parameet KumarDepartment of Biotechnology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Manas K Sen
Devendra S Chauhan
Vishwa M Katoch
Sarman Singh
Hanumanthappa K Prasad
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INDepartment of Biotechnology · INMinistry of Health and Family Welfare · INNational JALMA Institute for Leprosy & Other Mycobacterial Diseases · INVardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital · IN

Funding

TUBERCULOSIS RESEARCH MATERIALS AND VACINE TESTINGN01AI075320 · NIAID · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY-FORT COLLINS · 1997 to 2004
$980k
NIAID NIH HHS AI-75320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nonspecific clinical presentation and paucibacillary nature of tuberculous pleuritis remains a challenge for diagnosis. Diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion depends on the demonstration of the presence of tubercle bacilli in the sputum, pleural fluid, or pleural biopsy specimen, or demonstration of granuloma in pleura by histological examination. We examined the clinical utility of the diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis using the in house N-PCR assay, AFB smear microscopy and culture. Besides pleural fluid the inclusion of sputum in the efficacy of diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis was scrutinized. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsPleural fluid and sputum samples of 58 tuberculous and 42 non-tuberculous pleural effusion patients were processed for AFB smear microscopy, culture and the N-PCR assay. Mycobacteria were detected exclusively in tuberculous pleural effusion samples. None of the non-tuberculous pleural effusion samples were positive for mycobacteria. Comparative analysis showed that the N-PCR assay had the highest sensitivity. Inclusion of sputum along with pleural fluid increased N-PCR sensitivity from 51.7 to 70.6% (p<0.0001).This improved sensitivity was reflected in AFB smear microscopy and isolation by culture. The sensitivity enhanced on inclusion of sputum from 3.4 (p = 0.50) to 10.3% (p = 0.038) for AFB smear microscopy and for isolation of mycobacteria from 10.3(p = 0.03) to 22.4% (p = 0.0005). Thirteen isolates were obtained from 58 pleural tuberculosis patients. Eleven mycobacterial isolates were identified as M. tuberculosis and two as M. fortuitum and M. chelonae. Complete concordance was seen between the biochemical identification of isolates and the N-PCR identification of mycobacterial species prior to isolation. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: To the best of our knowledge this is the first PCR based report on utility of sputum for diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis. The present study demonstrates that a combination of pleural fluid with sputum sample and N-PCR improved the diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis.

Indexed as

HumansMycobacterium tuberculosisPleural EffusionPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySputumTuberculosis, Pleural

Identifiers

PMID20419090
PMCPMC2856669
OpenAlexW2079690168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.