Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20417899›Full record

ReviewJournal of feline medicine and surgery2010

Treatment of corneal ulcers: what are the medical options?

Claudia Hartley

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Medical management of deep ulcerative keratitis in cats: 13 cases.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2019
    Article
  5. Use of canine sourced platelet-rich plasma in a feline contaminated cutaneous wound.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2017
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudia HartleyAnimal Health Trust, Lanwades Park, Kentford, Newmarket, Suffolk CB8 7UU, UK. claudia.hartley@aht.org.uk
Animal Health Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

practical relevanceCorneal ulcers in cats (ulcerative keratitis) are a common presenting complaint, and are a frequent sequela to feline herpesvirus (FHV-1) infection. In fact, it is fair to assume an FHV-1 aetiology until proven otherwise. In practice, therefore, many cases of corneal ulceration can be treated medically, but treatment can frequently be challenging, with the need to tailor therapy carefully to the type of ulcer, the individual cat and its temperament. PATIENT GROUP: All age groups and breeds can suffer with ulcerative keratitis although some breeds are over-represented for some types of corneal ulceration. EVIDENCE BASE: The scientific literature on feline ulcerative keratitis is extensive, particularly that related to FHV-1 infection. This article reviews the medical treatment options for corneal ulceration in cats with reference to the current evidence base.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiviral AgentsCat DiseasesCatsCorneal UlcerHerpesviridaeHerpesviridae InfectionsAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID20417899
PMCPMC11318758
OpenAlexW1879022748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.