Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20417005›Full record

Trial reportSocial science & medicine (1982)2010

Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening.

Amanda J Dillard, Angela Fagerlin, Sonya Dal Cin, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher, Peter A Ubel

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Social science & medicine (1982), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04236544 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Impact of a Multimedia Website With Patient Experiences of Multiple Sclerosis (PExMS) on Immunotherapy Decision-making: a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial in a Mixed-methods Design

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfRan2024 to 2025Enrolled55ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, Patient Engagement, Self EfficacyArmsPExMS and DECIMS-Wiki, DECIMS-Wiki
NCT04450264 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Increasing African Immigrant's Breast Cancer Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRan2020 to 2023Enrolled155ConditionsBreast CancerArmsAfrican Immigrant Breast Cancer Education Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Interventions to Engage Affective Forecasting in Health-Related Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Using Narratives to Correct Forecasting Errors in Pediatric Tracheostomy Decision Making.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Leveraging Patient Education to Amplify Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States: Strategies and Implications.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda J DillardUniversity of Michigan, Center for Behavioral and Decision Sciences in Medicine, 300 N Ingalls, 7B02, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. dillaram@gvsu.edu
Angela Fagerlin
Sonya Dal Cin
Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Peter A Ubel

Funding

Training / Career DevelopmentP50CA101451 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI STRECHER, VICTOR J · 2003 to 2012
$18.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA101451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Narratives from similar others may be an effective way to increase important health behaviors. In this study, we used a narrative intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening. Researchers have suggested that people may overestimate barriers to colorectal cancer screening. We recruited participants from the US, ages 49-60 who had never previously been screened for colorectal cancer, to read an educational message about screening for the disease. One-half of participants were randomly assigned to also receive a narrative within the message (control participants did not receive a narrative). The narrative intervention was developed according to predictions of affective forecasting theory. Compared to participants who received only the educational message, participants who received the message along with a narrative reported that the barriers to screening would have less of an impact on a future screening experience. The narrative also increased risk perception for colorectal cancer and interest in screening in the next year.

Indexed as

NarrationAffectColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleForecastingHealth PromotionHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRisk AssessmentSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID20417005
PMCPMC4033575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.