Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20415601›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on emerging drugs2010

The future is today: emerging drugs for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

Maarten Albersen, Alan W Shindel, Kuwong B Mwamukonda, Tom F Lue

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on emerging drugs, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neural correlates of antidepressant-related sexual dysfunction: a placebo-controlled fMRI study on healthy males under subchronic paroxetine and bupropion.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2011
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A novel ROCK inhibitor: off-target effects of metformin.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Erectile dysfunction.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maarten AlbersenBasic Research Fellow Male Sexual Dysfunction, University of California at San Francisco, Department of Urology, Knuppe Molecular Urology Laboratory, Campus Box 0738, San Francisco, CA 94143-0738, USA.
Alan W Shindel
Kuwong B Mwamukonda
Tom F Lue

Funding

Prevention and Treatment of ImpotenceR37DK045370 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LUE, TOM F · 2004 to 2013
$3.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK045370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importance of the fieldErectile dysfunction (ED) is the most common male sexual dysfunction presented for treatment affecting between 10 and 20% of men. PDE type 5 inhibitors (PDE5I) now account for the largest segment of the ED market. While these drugs are highly efficacious for many men, a relatively large subset of ED patients who do not respond to PDE5I is increasingly recognized. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: In this review, we discuss clinical and preclinical evidence supporting various emerging compounds that regulate penile erection both centrally (clavulanic acid, dopamine and melanocortin receptor agonists) and peripherally (novel PDE5I, soluble and particulate guanylil cyclase activators, rho-kinase inhibitors and maxi-K channel openers). WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: The reader will gain a broad understanding of erectile (patho-)physiology and gain insights in the mechanisms of action, efficacy and adverse events of various compounds under development for the treatment of ED. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: We expect emerging drugs to allow treatment protocols tailored to the specific needs of each individual patient, taking into consideration the efficacy of erectile performance enhancement and the potential for adverse events. This tailored approach may include combination of various emerging drugs to enhance efficacy in difficult-to-treat patients.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicDrug DesignErectile DysfunctionHumansMalePenile ErectionPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsPhosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID20415601
PMCPMC3163612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.