Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20414696›Full record

ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2010

Integrated protein network and microarray analysis to identify potential biomarkers after myocardial infarction.

Yvan Devaux, Francisco Azuaje, Mélanie Vausort, Céline Yvorra, Daniel R Wagner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. VEGF-B gene therapy inhibits doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity by endothelial protection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Thrombospondin-1 and CD47 regulation of cardiac, pulmonary and vascular responses in health and disease.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yvan DevauxLaboratory of Cardiovascular Research, Centre de Recherche Public-Santé, 120 route d'Arlon, 1150, Luxembourg, Luxembourg. yvan.devaux@crp-sante.lu
Francisco Azuaje
Mélanie Vausort
Céline Yvorra
Daniel R Wagner
Laboratoire National de Santé · LUCentre Hospitalier de Luxembourg · LU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significant proportion of patients develop left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (MI). Existing biomarkers of HF provide limited information after MI. To identify new prognostic biomarkers in MI patients, we designed an approach combining protein interaction networks and microarray analysis of blood cells. Blood samples for RNA and protein analysis were taken from 127 acute MI patients. Echocardiography was performed at one month. Assuming that angiogenesis is related to cardiac repair after MI, a protein-protein interaction network of angiogenesis was constructed and analyzed. Among the 556 proteins and 686 interactions of this network, a cluster of 53 proteins highly specialized in regulation of cell growth was identified. Of these 53 proteins, 38 were found differentially expressed by microarrays between low (< or = 40%) and high (>40%) LV ejection fraction (EF) patients (n = 32). Among these 38 genes, prediction analysis identified a set of three genes able to predict significant LV dysfunction (EF < or = 40%) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.82. These three genes-vascular endothelial growth factor B, thrombospondin-1 and placental growth factor-had a stronger predictive value than brain natriuretic peptide and troponin T (AUC of 0.63). Independent validations on protein expression and quantitative PCR datasets confirmed the results. In conclusion, a new strategy is described that allows identifying new potential biomarkers. The three specific biomarkers described here remain to be validated in a larger patient population.

Indexed as

Oligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProtein Interaction MappingBiomarkersBlood CellsCluster AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingHumansModels, CardiovascularMyocardial InfarctionNatriuretic Peptide, BrainNeovascularization, PathologicProtein BindingStroke VolumeTroponin TBiomarkersNatriuretic Peptide, BrainTroponin T

Identifiers

PMID20414696
OpenAlexW2084218441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.