Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20414671›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2010

Critical velocity, anaerobic distance capacity, maximal instantaneous velocity and aerobic inertia in sprint and endurance young swimmers.

Rodrigo Zacca, Bruno München Wenzel, Jeferson Steffanello Piccin, Nilson Romeu Marcilio, André Luiz Lopes, Flávio Antônio de Souza Castro

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pacing in World-Class Age Group Swimmers in 100 and 200 m Freestyle, Backstroke, Breaststroke, and Butterfly.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reproducibility of an aerobic endurance test for nonexpert swimmers.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rodrigo ZaccaLaboratório de Pesquisa do Exercício-LAPEX, Escola de Educação Física (ESEF/UFRGS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Felizardo 750, Jardim Botânico, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP: 90690-200, Brazil. rodrigozacca@yahoo.com.br
Bruno München Wenzel
Jeferson Steffanello Piccin
Nilson Romeu Marcilio
André Luiz Lopes
Flávio Antônio de Souza Castro
University of Rio Grande and Rio Grande Community College · USUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical velocity (CV), anaerobic distance capacity (ADC), maximal instantaneous velocity (V (max)), and aerobic inertia (tau) were calculated from two (CV(2par) and ADC(2par)), three (CV(3par), ADC(3par), and V (max 3par)), and four-parameter model data (CV(4par), ADC(4par), V (max 4par), and tau), which were obtained from six different times and distances (50, 100, 200, 400, 800, and 1,500 m) swum in front crawl stroke under maximal intensity. Fourteen swimmers (14-15-year-old; sprint and endurance groups, each group n = 7) volunteered in this study. CV values were not influenced by the groups. The model effects showed that CV(2par) was higher than CV(3par) and CV(4par) regardless of the group used. In addition, CV(3par) and CV(4par) were similar. ADC seems to be better estimated using both three- and four-parameter models. V (max) was higher in the sprint group regardless of the model used. The models effects showed that the V (max 4par) was higher than the V (max 3par) regardless of the group. Sprint and endurance groups showed similar tau values. The analysis of the models (F test, coefficient of determination R (2), and adjusted coefficient of determination R (adjusted) (2) ) showed that the three-parameter model was more appropriate among the applied models. Although the four-parameter model showed better correlation for the endurance group, the inclusion of tau (fourth parameter) did not significantly improve the quality of adjustment. However, it is important to emphasize the availability of another parameter for the study of bioenergetics in swimming and other sports.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalMuscle ContractionPhysical EnduranceSwimmingAdolescentAge FactorsAnaerobic ThresholdEnergy MetabolismHumansMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthRegression AnalysisTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID20414671
OpenAlexW2086166701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.