Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20414663›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2010

Time of admission, quality of PCI care, and outcome of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Birga Maier, Steffen Behrens, Claudia Graf-Bothe, Holger Kuckuck, Jens-Uwe Roehnisch, Ralph G Schoeller, Helmut Schuehlen, Heinz P Theres

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Association of Admission Time and Mortality in STEMI Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Direct admission versus transfer of AMI patients for primary PCI.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Birga MaierBerliner Herzinfarktregister, Technische Universitaet Berlin, Mueller Breslau Str. VWS4 HI, 10623, Berlin, Germany. birga.maier@tu-berlin.de
Steffen Behrens
Claudia Graf-Bothe
Holger Kuckuck
Jens-Uwe Roehnisch
Ralph G Schoeller
Helmut Schuehlen
Heinz P Theres

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur study aimed to analyse the hospital mortality of patients admitted in- and off-regular working hours with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) within the special logistical setting of the urban area of the city of Berlin.

backgroundThere is a debate whether patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospital outside regular working hours experience higher mortality rates than those admitted within regular working hours.

methodsThis study analyses data from the Berlin Myocardial Infarction Registry and comprises 2,131 patients with STEMI and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 2004-2007. Data of patients admitted during in- and off-regular working hours were compared.

resultsThere was significant difference in door-to-balloon time (median in-hours: 79 min; median off-hours: 90 min, p < 0.001) and in hospital mortality (in-hours: 4.3%; off-hours: 6.8%, p = 0.020) between STEMI patients admitted in- and off-hours for treatment with PCI. After adjustment, admission off-hours remained an independent predictor for in-hospital death for patients (OR = 2.50; 95% CI 1.38-4.56). In patients with primary care from physician-escorted Emergency Medical Services (EMS), door-to-balloon time was reduced by 10 min for in-hours as well as off-hours patients. The difference in hospital mortality between off-hour and in-hour admission was reduced to a non-significant OR = 1.61 (95% CI 0.79-3.27).

conclusionsIn conclusion, patients admitted off-hours experienced longer door-to-balloon times and higher hospital mortality than did those admitted in-hours. The differences observed between patients admitted in-hours and off-hours were reduced through physician-escorted EMS reflecting the influence of optimized STEMI care.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAgedBerlinFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.