ReviewBioanalysis2009
Recent advances in microfluidic detection systems.
Review in Bioanalysis, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Processing and inspection of high-pressure microfluidics systems: A review.Biomicrofluidics · 2025Review
- The use of droplet-based microfluidic technologies for accelerated selection ofBiology methods & protocols · 2024Review
- Dielectrophoresis-Based SERS Sensors for the Detection of Cancer Cells in Microfluidic Chips.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Paper-Based Immunosensors with Bio-Chemiluminescence Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A critical review: Recent advances in "digital" biomolecule detection with single copy sensitivity.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2021Review
- Chromium Monitoring in Water by Colorimetry Using Optimised 1,5-Diphenylcarbazide Method.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Malaria and the 'last' parasite: how can technology help?Malaria journal · 2018Review
- Microfluidic approaches for isolation, detection, and characterization of extracellular vesicles: Current status and future directions.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2017Review
- A simple integrated microfluidic device for the multiplexed fluorescence-free detection of Salmonella enterica.The Analyst · 2016Article
- Article
- Sheath-flow microfluidic approach for combined surface enhanced Raman scattering and electrochemical detection.Analytical chemistry · 2015Article
- Microfluidic LC device with orthogonal sample extraction for on-chip MALDI-MS detection.Lab on a chip · 2013Article
- Advances in microfluidic materials, functions, integration, and applications.Chemical reviews · 2013Review
- Microfluidic Paper-Based Analytical Devices (μPADs) and Micro Total Analysis Systems (μTAS): Development, Applications and Future Trends.Chromatographia · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are numerous detection methods available for microfluidic analyses. Both conventional and novel detection methods are being put to use for detection on these miniaturized systems, with the analyte of interest driving the choice of detection method. In this article, we summarize microfluidic-based detection strategies from the last 2 years. More focus is given to unconventional approaches to detection routes and novel strategies for performing high-sensitivity detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.