Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20414256›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2010

The nuclear envelope in genome organization, expression and stability.

Karim Mekhail, Danesh Moazed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 165 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Fibrillarin: bridging ribosome biogenesis and apoptosis in cellular stress and disease.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Review
  4. Nucleoskeletal Proteins in Early Embryogenesis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Molecular Mechanisms for the Regulation of Nuclear Membrane Integrity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karim MekhailDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 Kings College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. karim.mekhail@utoronto.ca
Danesh Moazed

Funding

MECHANISM OF ACTION OF YEAST SILENCING COMPLEXESR01GM061641 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI MOAZED, DANESH · 2000 to 2014
$3.9M
CIHRHoward Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-random positioning of chromosomal domains relative to each other and to nuclear landmarks is a common feature of eukaryotic genomes. In particular, the distribution of DNA loci relative to the nuclear periphery has been linked to both transcriptional activation and repression. Nuclear pores and other integral membrane protein complexes are key players in the dynamic organization of the genome in the nucleus, and recent advances in our understanding of the molecular networks that organize genomes at the nuclear periphery point to a further role for non-random locus positioning in DNA repair, recombination and stability.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGenomic InstabilityAnimalsCytoskeletonDNAGenomeHumansNuclear EnvelopeDNA

Identifiers

PMID20414256
PMCPMC3246372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.