Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20414203›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2010

Architecture of inherited susceptibility to common cancer.

Olivia Fletcher, Richard S Houlston

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 223 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Breast cancer: pathogenesis and treatments.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. GermlineCancers · 2021
    Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olivia FletcherOlivia Fletcher is at the Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK.
Richard S Houlston
Breast Cancer Now · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Timeline article looks back at 40 years of research into the inherited genetic basis of cancer and the insights these studies have yielded. Early epidemiological research provided evidence for the 'two-hit' model of cancer predisposition. During the 1980s and 1990s linkage and positional cloning analyses led to the identification of high-penetrance cancer susceptibility genes. The past decade has seen a shift from models of predisposition based on single-gene causative mutations to multigenic models. These models suggest that a high proportion of cancers may arise in a genetically susceptible minority as a consequence of the combined effects of common low-penetrance alleles and rare disease-causing variants that confer moderate cancer risks.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID20414203
OpenAlexW2068732691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.